Of all
the quotations headlining The Big Short’s
segments, this is the only one that was made up for the film by screenwriter/director
Adam McKay. Ironically enough, it’s also the only one that describes it with
any kind of honesty. Lavishly rewarded by critics and award ceremonies for its
provocative wit and financial literacy, The
Big Short purports to expose the mechanics of our fraudulent financial
system in an entertaining and accessible manner without dumbing anything down;
yet for all its cocky bluster and cinematic muscle-flexing, it doesn’t produce
a single nugget of truth that couldn’t already be found in the pages of the Wall Street Journal.
Though
it may come as a surprise that Paramount would hire the man behind Anchorman: The Legend Of Ron Burgundy to
adapt and direct Michael Lewis’s non-fiction account of the 2007-2008 financial
crisis, it really shouldn’t. McKay’s brand of uber-ironic,
wink-wink-nudge-nudge humour is exactly the kind that’s been dominating Comedy
Central and mainstream online outlets for the past decade. It is by no means
“bad” humour – insofar as there is such a thing – but it does not apply itself
easily to a subject matter as complex and impactful as global economics. Too
often, the comedy reduces the topic at hand to a series of compartmentalized
facts and emotions that viewers may absorb and digest without having to truly think about their relationship with what
these facts and emotions signify.
The Big Short, sadly, only tends to confirm this trend. Through
the interconnected paths of misunderstood financial geniuses and outsiders who
predicted the crash of the housing market and tried to make money off of it,
McKay and co-screenwriter Charles Randolph congratulate their audience for
feeling as smart, shrewd and cynical as the characters they project themselves
on, moving the pace fast enough so that the inevitable moral “pay-off”
registers them as victims of the system rather than the complicit perpetrators
they are. Because the audience is too busy chuckling at the zingers, listening
to celebrity lectures on economics and nodding at the sly in-jokes (want a crash-course in financial jargon?
Here’s Margot Robbie from The Wolf Of Wall Street!), they don’t have time to ponder
their own participation in such systems and nothing of any lasting value is
truly gained, save perhaps the knowledge of certain facts – but as Werner
Herzog once said, “facts do not illuminate; they create norms.”1
It’s
ironic that McKay should use Wolf Of Wall
Street as a reference point – not just for the Margot Robbie cameo but for
the irreverent, fast-paced, fourth-wall breaking humour – while ostensibly presenting
itself as its more overtly critical cousin, and yet prove substantially less
informative. As outrageous and profane as their comedy was, Martin Scorsese and
Terence Winter never used it to keep the viewer at a safe, comfortable
intellectual distance from the plot and characters – on the contrary, they
pulled them just close enough for the appeal of easy, immediate pleasure to touch
their mind before the next gag pushed them back. McKay and Randolph’s humour is
too self-satisfied to ever risk leading the viewer too far from their comfort
zone.
This
pervasive smugness consistently undermines the tragicomic nature of the
enterprise; as in The
Revenant, fine acting is wasted by a director who seems more interested
in using it for effect than in forging any rapport between character and viewer.
No matter how assiduously Christian Bale commits to giving financial whiz
Michael Burry a thoughtful and accurate portrayal, McKay rarely sees him as anything
more than a Sheldon Cooper clone. Conversely, he embraces Ryan Gosling’s self-consciously
amoral trader/audience host Jared Vennett2 with no critical distance
whatsoever, as if his cool machismo was inherently subversive.
Only
Steve Carell’s implosive portrayal of troubled hedge fund manager Mark Baum3 fits in harmoniously with McKay’s style and
tone. Like an unwitting reservoir for all the frustrations and mistakes borne
by Carell’s past comedy protagonist, Baum burns with an unfocused righteous
indignation and helplessness that the film seems reluctant to acknowledge as
its raison d’être. Carell’s sincerity
complements McKay’s irony well enough to offer tantalizing previews of a better-told
story.
And yet,
despite her role barely amounting to 10 minutes of screen-time, it is Adepero
Oduye who leaves the strongest impression of all, as Baum’s long-suffering
advisor Kathy Tao. In the virtuosic brew of big names, cutaway jokes, news
footage and big names concocted by McKay and editor Hank Corwin, Oduye’s
humanity stands out with discreet grace. Her silent response to Baum’s enquiry
about the seriousness of his firm’s situation outshines even her distinguished
colleagues’ entire performances.
Nothing The Big Short tries to say about Wall
Street finance and capitalism matches the eloquence of its unintentional
demonstration of infotainment’s appeal and limitations: Visual prowess, self-aware
humour and the unquestioned certainty of its target audience’s political virtue
may provide satisfactory entertainment on their own, but they do not
necessarily create any meaning on their own.
1http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/interview-with-director-werner-herzog-i-am-clinically-sane-a-677631.html
2Based on real-life
trader Greg Lippmann.
3Based on real-life hedge
fund manager Steve Eisman.
The youth! Pro before you begin activities should be set given direction. For example, people who travel sailing, we must first set a destination, halfway pointer, just pointing in this direction, in order to have a day to reach the destination. If uncertain direction, carried by the wind turn, fear never reach the day.
ReplyDelete____________________________
I like: RS Gold and Cheap RS Gold